Pakistani people have won, may Allah have mercy on Pakistan, Shahbaz Sharif

 

Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) President Shahbaz Sharif has said that Pakistani people have won, may Allah have mercy on Pakistan, today the politics of lies, deception and accusations are buried, supremacy of constitution. Thanks to the support and campaigners for He said in his tweet on Twitter that thanks to the support and campaigners for the supremacy of the constitution, today the politics of lies, deception and accusations are buried, the Pakistani people have won, may God have mercy on Pakistan.

Similarly, Central Vice President PML-N Maryam Nawaz chanted the slogan "Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif". He said in his message on Twitter that thank God, Lord of the worlds, congratulations to the nation on the rise of the Constitution. The work of the violators of the constitution is done forever.

May Allah keep Pakistan shining brightly. He said that Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif, insha'Allah, congratulates Pakistan on its liberation from the enemy of the people, the most incompetent, the most incompetent and the most failed government.

It may be recalled that a five-member larger bench headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Umar Ata Bandial also heard for the fifth day in a row the suo motu notice on the Deputy Speaker Rolling case and petitions of various parties. And Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel was also present in the bench. After the hearing, the larger bench reserved its verdict. Before delivering the verdict, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Omar Ata Bandial summoned the Chief Action Commissioner to inquire about the election and delimitation of constituencies.

The Chief Justice said that he would request the Chief Election Commissioner to inform him about the capacity to hold elections. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court asked the Election Commissioner to state whether the Election Commission has the capacity to hold elections. He said that the time has come for the Election Commission to hold elections, but the demarcations are still pending. He had written 16 letters to the Prime Minister in this regard that demarcations would take place after the census.

The Chief Justice inquired whether the whole country should be demarcated or some areas. On which the Election Commissioner said that constituencies of the whole country are to be demarcated, 6 to 7 months are required for elections. Later, at around 8.30 am, the Supreme Court of Pakistan ruled in the case of self-notice on the rolling of the Deputy Speaker. In the decision, a five-member larger bench has restored the National Assembly. By consensus, a detailed decision will be issued later.

The decision said that the rolling of the Deputy Speaker on April 3 was unconstitutional. Dissolving the National Assembly was also against the law. The Supreme Court also declared unconstitutional adjournment of the National Assembly. The no-confidence motion will remain pending, the Speaker said.

Members of the National Assembly will be able to vote on the no-confidence motion. If the no-confidence motion is successful, a new Prime Minister will be elected. Rolling the Deputy Speaker has been declared unconstitutional and null and void. The court has also declared the dissolution of the Assembly unconstitutional.

All measures for the formation of caretaker government have been declared null and void. All members of the National Assembly will be able to cast a vote of no-confidence on their own accord, however, the court's decision will not affect the implementation of Article 63. Earlier in the day, on Thursday, April 7, at the beginning of the hearing, the situation in Punjab was mentioned. Chaudhry Sarwar will take oath from Hamza Shahbaz in Bagh-e-Jinnah.

Advocate General said that Hamza Shahbaz has also called a meeting of bureaucrats. The constitution is a very trivial matter for these people. I do not want to divert attention from the case of the National Assembly. Justice Mazhar Alam Mian Khel said that the doors of the Punjab Assembly were sealed yesterday. Can the Assembly be sealed in this way? Removed

Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel asked whether the Prime Minister is not the representative of the whole nation. Barrister Ali Zafar, counsel for the President, said that the Prime Minister is undoubtedly the representative of the people. Justice Mazhar Alam Khel said that if the constitution is violated in the parliament, it will be protected. Is the court not the protector of the constitution? Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel said that if anyone is affected by the proceedings of the parliament then how can there be justice. If there is no justice then the court should remain silent.

Barrister Ali Zafar said that the protection of the constitution can only be in accordance with the constitution, the formation of the government and the dissolution of the assembly can be reviewed by the court. The Chief Justice said that if the no-confidence motion had been voted on, it would have been known who would be the Prime Minister. Yes, every article of the constitution has to be taken into consideration.

According to the news agency, the Chief Justice said that if the abuse is from the entire House instead of a single member, what will happen? Barrister Ali Zafar said that if there is a difference of opinion among the judges, will Parliament interveneThe Chief Justice asked whether the process of formation of the federal government was an internal matter of the parliament. Barrister Ali Zafar said that the election of the Prime Minister and the no-confidence motion was a matter of Parliament. The National Assembly is formed because it has to elect its own Speaker and Prime Minister.

Chief Justice Omar Ata Bandial said that the decision which you have referred to, Ali Zafar Sahib, is related to oath. Ali Zafar, counsel for the President, while referring to the decision of Junejo case, said that the government of Muhammad Khan Junejo was overthrown, the court declared the overthrow of Junejo's government unconstitutional ۔

Justice Mazhar Alam Mian Khalil said that the issue before us is a matter of no-confidence. Rolling came after the no-confidence motion. Please address this issue. If there is a constitutional crisis, then where is the Prime Minister continuing his work in accordance with the constitution? The process of appointment of caretaker Prime Minister is also going on. Where is the crisis?

Barrister Ali Zafar said that my request is that there is no constitutional crisis in the country. Chief Justice Omar Ata Bandial said that apparently Article 95 was violated. Billions of rupees are spent by the nation on this. Every election will cost the nation billions. This is in the national interest. The National Assembly was dissolved on the advice of the Prime Minister.

Barrister Ali Zafar said that the election was announced by dissolving the assembly here too. The announcement of the election shows that the government's move was not malicious. Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan said that despite the deviant members, the PTI is the majority party, what will happen if the majority party is out of the system.

Barrister Ali Zafar said that as the lawyer of the President, he could not give a political issue and at the same time his arguments were completed. He did not interfere in the proceedings, the matter before the court is the proceedings of the House, the proceedings of the House are beyond the jurisdiction of the judiciary, the court asked the Parliament to clean up its own mess.

The Chief Justice remarked that the country is left helpless for 90 days by calling for elections. The Prime Minister is acting on the instructions of the President. Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan said that if a coalition government is formed, is it possible that Imtiaz Siddiqui said that the opposition had not objected to the presidency of the Deputy Speaker. He is not accountable to the court for this.

Imtiaz Siddiqui said that the Supreme Court could not interfere in the proceedings of Parliament under Article 69. Justice Muneeb Akhtar said that the decisions cited contained observations and the court was not bound by the observations made in the decisions. He said that the Deputy Speaker had relied on the National Security Committee and no one could influence the National Security Committee.

The Chief Justice inquired as to when the minutes of the National Security Committee were placed before the Deputy Speaker, to which Imtiaz Siddiqui said that he did not know about the matter of the Deputy Speaker. The Chief Justice said that according to him, the Deputy Speaker had the material on the day of voting which was given rolling. The Prime Minister violated the limits of Article 58. What will be the consequences? Why didn't the Speaker reject the no-confidence motion on March 28?

Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan said that if the Assembly had not been dissolved, the House could have ended the rolling of the Deputy Speaker. The Prime Minister took advantage of the situation and dissolved the Assembly. He could have suspended the membership. The Prime Minister did not show any malice. The Prime Minister said that the elections would cost billions of rupees.

The Chief Justice said that you are saying that the Prime Minister made the plan on his own, why the Speaker did not give the rolling motion on March 28. Imtiaz Siddiqui said that there was no plan to reject the no-confidence motion. Following the completion of Imtiaz Siddiqui's arguments, Naeem Bukhari, who followed the Speaker, said that the question was that the point of order could not be taken in the no-confidence motion, could the point of order be discussed at any time. Yes, I will give arguments on this, point of order can be taken on any occasion including no-confidence motion.

The Chief Justice said that the point of order was removed by the Law Minister. Do you have the text of the Law Minister's point of order? Justice Mazhar Alam inquired whether any material was presented to the Speaker. Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel inquired that Rolling was constitutional or unconstitutional, if rolling was unconstitutional then what is supreme?Naeem Bukhari said that in the past the Supreme Court had refrained from intervening. If Speaker Fawad Chaudhry's point of order had been rejected, could the Supreme Court have been approached. ۔

Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel inquired whether the Speaker's refusal to vote on the no-confidence motion was unconstitutional. He said that in the past when the assembly was dissolved, the election process was not stopped even though it was declared wrong.

Naeem Bukhari said that as soon as the proceedings of the assembly started, Fawad Chaudhry demanded a point of order. If voting on a no-confidence motion had started, a point of order could not have been taken. What is the difference between what Naeem Bukhari said that the words Motion and Tehreek are used in the same term.

Naeem Bukhari, counsel for the Speaker and Deputy Speaker, presented the minutes of the Parliamentary Committee on National Security in the court. The Chief Justice said that the question is whether a new point of order can be raised when a no-confidence motion is raised.

Justice Muneeb Akhtar inquired whether the point of order raised was on the agenda. Naeem Bukhari replied that the point of order could be discussed at any time. Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel said that voting on no-confidence motion was constitutional. Naeem Bukhari, referring to the Question Hour in the March 28 National Assembly session, said that all the opposition members had said, "Don't ask questions, just hold a vote, this noise." The Deputy Speaker adjourned the meeting.

He said that the parliamentary committee on national security was briefed on the letter and the committee was told that if the no-confidence motion failed then the results would not be good. The names of those who briefed the parliamentary committee are not included in the minutes of the meeting. Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan said who gave the briefing to the parliamentary committee.

Justice Mazhar Alam said that the proceedings of the Parliament lasted for two or three minutes with great difficulty. The Chief Justice asked whether the opposition should not have been given a chance at the point of order. Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel said that the minutes of the parliamentary committee meeting did not indicate the presence of the deputy speaker, whether the deputy speaker was present in the meeting.

Naeem Bukhari said that the document presented may not be genuine. Justice Jamal Mandokhel asked whether the foreign minister was present in the parliamentary committee meeting. The court said that the foreign minister should have been present in the parliamentary committee meeting.

The Chief Justice said that 57 members were present in the National Security Meeting of the Parliamentary Committee. The contents of the letter were included in the notice of the members of the Assembly. Presenting Chaudhry's point of order, he said that point of order is not discussed. Attorney General Khalid Javed Khan while initiating arguments said that he would not be able to give details of National Security Committee meeting in open court. Can decide without question.

He said that the Prime Minister is the biggest stakeholder so he has the power to dissolve the Assembly. It is not necessary to give reasons to the Prime Minister for dissolving the Assembly. After all, voting on a no-confidence motion was not a fundamental right of a member, but the right to vote is subject to the Constitution and Assembly Rules. If the Speaker suspends a member, he cannot come to court for reinstatement.

The Chief Justice said that you want to say that the no-confidence motion is subject to voting rules. The attorney general said that all proceedings, including the no-confidence motion, are in accordance with the rules. Will decide

He said that the court could intervene if the speaker announces that the low-voting person should become the prime minister. The Attorney General said that political parties have an important role to play in the parliamentary system of government. Has achieved

He said that the no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Imran Khan had ended on March 28. The motion of no-confidence has to be approved by the House. نThe Attorney General said that it is not necessary to have 20% ie 68 members for approval of the motion, what will happen if 68 members approve the motion and reject more than that.

Justice Muneeb Akhtar said that if 172 members approve the motion, then the Prime Minister will resign. The Chief Justice said that while laying the groundwork for the motion of no-confidence, one has to state the basis. The Attorney General said that it is not necessary to state any basis for the motion of no-confidence. The difference of three to seven days between doing and voting is not without reason, in seven days the Prime Minister can convince his angry members.

Justice Muneeb Akhtar said that 20% of the members should have debated when they moved the motion. The Prime Minister knows everything. So could the motion have been rejected before it was moved, to which the Attorney General said that it could have been rejected even when it was presented. The motion of no confidence was not allowed to be presented legally.

Justice Mazhar Alam said that the Speaker has declared that the motion has been passed. How can you challenge it? The Attorney General said that the question is to what extent the judiciary has the power to scrutinize the proceedings of the Parliament.

Justice Muneeb Akhtar said that the Speaker is the protector of Parliament, does the Speaker have the power to go against the constitutional requirements. The Attorney General said that when the no-confidence motion was passed, there were 169 members. Akhtar said that if your point is taken into account then 172 members were present in the parliament. In that sense, the prime minister has resigned.

Justice Muneeb Akhtar said that suppose 68 members are required to move a no-confidence motion. There are 67 members. The speaker counts 68. The Attorney General said that my main case is that the motion of no-confidence was not approved.

Chief Justice Omar Ata Bandial said that there should be 172 members for voting, 172 members are not required at the Leo Grant stage, under Article 55 decisions are taken by majority in the House. Justice Muneeb Akhtar said that The Chief Justice said that the dissolution of the Assembly is the real issue and we want to hear about it. We have to see the time difference between the dissolution of the Assembly and the rolling of the Speaker.

The Attorney General said that the assembly was dissolved only after the no-confidence motion was dealt with. He will do as he pleases, the court will not see who will come and who will not, will not go to the results. The Attorney General said that I am not defending Rolling, my plea is for new elections.

According to private TV, Chief Justice Omar Ata Bandial said, "We have to look at the national interest as well. One thing is clear, Rolling is wrong. We have to see what will happen next." It is very clear that Rolling was given wrongly, the question is what to do next, now tell the Attorney General and the lawyers of PML-N how to proceed, we have to look after the national interest.

Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that the court should not make a decision based on the circumstances and results, the court has to make a decision keeping in view the constitution. The attorney general said that the court had rejected the review of the sacked employees and paved the way for their reinstatement. He said that the opposition leaders are also present and take suggestions from the opposition. How stable it would be if someone formed a government today.

The court summoned the Leader of the Opposition to the rostrum. The Chief Justice said that there was no money left for electricity and other facilities in Sri Lanka. This will be a very difficult task for the leader. Coming to the rostrum, Shahbaz Sharif said that being a common man, I will not speak legally, it is an honor for me to appear before the court.

He said that my only request was to restore the National Assembly. The constitution has been violated many times in our history. In the name of Pakistan, the parliament should be restored, the parliament should be allowed to vote on no-confidence, as the Leader of the Opposition proposed the Charter of Economics, in the year 2018 the dollar was 125 rupees, now the dollar has reached 190, the parliament Should work.

Shahbaz Sharif said that PTI had also formed a government with its allies. In its first speech, it had talked about the Charter of Economy. Will goI will not make the same accusation, even today I say sign the Charter of Economy. Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel said that the opposition wanted to hold elections from the first day on which Shahbaz Sharif said that the problem is to break the constitution, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel "We will repair the constitution," he said.

PML-N lawyer Makhdoom Ali Khan told the court that it should not be said who will not leave whom, who will give a surprise, the Prime Minister had announced to give a surprise. Shahbaz Sharif said that he will work with his opposition to carry out electoral reforms so that transparent elections can take place. Will

The Attorney General said that everyone wants the members of the Assembly to become the elected Prime Minister of the people and those who have turned Imran Khan over will forgive Shahbaz Sharif. He said that the last words of the Attorney General were threatening, the stock market crashed, the dollar became expensive and the rupee depreciated.

Chief Justice said that these are all economic problems, Makhdoom Ali Khan said who created these economic problems Chief Justice said that I do not think we are sitting to answer questions. Makhdoom Ali Khan said that politics is changing day by day. Apart from deviant members, the opposition has 177 members. At the request of the Chief Justice, Makhdoom Ali Khan told the court the party-wise details of the opposition members.

The Chief Justice said that he was hearing the case under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution and would protect the rights of the people. Makhdoom Ali Khan said, Makhdoom Ali Khan said that Haji Saifullah case is a case of discrimination.

The Chief Justice said that you seem to have come to this point prepared. Makhdoom Ali Khan said that he knew that they would come this way. The Chief Justice said that 58 (2B) was removed from the constitution in a democratic manner. Makhdoom Ali Khan said that if the measures are ratified after this rolling, then a message will be sent to remove the plug so that the other does not come. PML-N lawyer said that there is a PTI government in three assemblies The President, with the concurrence of the Speaker, approved the summary.

The Chief Justice said that there are very serious allegations against the opposition, refrain from using harsh words, the court will not go on merit nor will it decide on the allegations. The family members cannot face the accusation. The Chief Justice said that those who have made the allegation of treason should prove it.

The Chief Justice said that the relationship between the political parties is so bad that it is not known whether they can go together or not, Mian Sahib they are angry with you and do not shake hands. No one was told anything. Shahbaz Sharif said that bring evidence of conspiracy and I will quit politics while accepting every sentence of the court. Chief Justice said that there is a lot of criticism about us on social media. Respectfully, the court will not allow anyone to disrespect.

The Chief Justice said that there is a lot of criticism about us on social media. Political people should not defile the premises of the Supreme Court. Yes, I was told to ban media talk outside. I told the staff that I would appeal to the politicians in the court room. Raza Rabbani said that he did not want to make the new election controversial. Controversially, elections will not work without reform in these circumstances.

The PML-N lawyer said that dissolving the assembly of Zia-ul-Haq and dissolving the assembly of Imran Khan were both unconstitutional. He also invited party chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari to the rostrum. Bilawal Bhutto said that we want supremacy of the constitution. Value.

The Chief Justice inquired where the United Opposition had prepared proposals for electoral reforms. Where are they? Submit proposals for electoral reforms. The Chief Justice said that politicians can live under one roof. We are angry, we want stability, peace and prosperity in the country, we are being criticized, social media has become very kind to us, there are fights and quarrels outside, this country is made for everyone, everyone has the right Should.

Later, the Supreme Court reserved its decision and announced that it would be announced at 7:30 pm. The session of the National Assembly chaired by Qasim Suri begins. Speaking during Question Hour, Law Minister Fawad Chaudhry raised serious objections to the resolution.

Fawad Chaudhry had termed the no-confidence motion of the opposition as an attempt to change the government of Pakistan from abroad.The Speaker dismissed the no-confidence motion as unconstitutional and adjourned the sitting indefinitely. Immediately after the adjournment of the lower house, Prime Minister Imran Khan addressed the nation. He announced to send a proposal for dissolution and directed the nation to prepare for new elections.

The Prime Minister had said that after the decision taken by the Speaker using his powers, he had sent a proposal to the President to dissolve the Assemblies. We should go to the people in a democratic manner and the people should decide who they want. The President had approved a proposal by the Prime Minister to dissolve the National Assembly under Articles 58 (1) and 48 (1) of the Constitution.

Late last night, after dramatic changes in the situation, President Arif Ali issued a decree directing that after the dissolution of the National Assembly, the Cabinet and the removal of the Prime Minister, the caretaker Prime Minister should be appointed. Imran Khan will continue to work in this position. Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Umar Ata Bandial had taken suo motu notice of the political situation that had arisen after the no-confidence motion against the Prime Minister was rejected by the opposition in the National Assembly by Deputy Speaker Qasim Suri.

Apart from the suo motu notice, petitions were also filed in the apex court by various parties on which a larger bench was constituted to hear the case. He said that all the orders of the Prime Minister and the President would be subject to the final decision of the Supreme Court.