The decision of the Supreme Court is an interference in the parliamentary boundaries, Federal Minister Asad Umar
Federal Minister for Planning Asad Umar has raised questions on the decision of the Supreme Court. He said that the decision of the Deputy Speaker was not good, so are there good decisions in the Supreme Court? Aren't the decisions of the Supreme Court called "Judicial Murder"? After that, if Parliament had fixed the date and time of cases in the Supreme Court, would it have been correct? Speaking in the National Assembly, he said that he would first respond to the words of Bilawal Bhutto. In 3 years, 5.5 million jobs were created. A letter was sent to him and his achievements started from March 8. Tell us what kind of democracy we are getting today. A deviant member said that life would be very good at Rs. 23 crore. Is in front of, stolen, votes were bought for Yousuf Raza Gilani, video is available Even if the opposition moves forward to stop it, it will move forward on its own so that no gunman can come forward. Is all this happening according to the constitution of Pakistan? The difference at this time is not between political parties but between two ideologies. The 220 million people of Pakistan are beggars, the second theory is that Pakistanis are no less than anyone in the world, Pakistan is at the crossroads at the moment, we have to decide What is the direction of the country? The solution will come from the votes of the people, not from speeches. If the government is changed by spending Rs. 15 billion, then there is a lot of haraam money here. It will not come out of the mall, the horse is also present, the election field is also present, let's decide again.
I have heard that the Balochistan government has changed to Rs 3.5 billion. If I had Rs 10.15 billion, I would have been doing something good. He said that the end of the current politics is not good, the Supreme Court has great respect, the judiciary, the judiciary and the administration, all three have great respect, it is very clear in the constitution that each institution works within its constitutional limits. If the opposition believes in democracy, then they will also believe in the supremacy of the parliament. If the Supreme Court decides on what day and minute the parliament will meet, then save money and send the parliament home. Let's assume that the decision of the Deputy Speaker was not good, but are all the decisions in the Supreme Court good? Aren't the decisions of the Supreme Court called "Judicial Murder"? Will Parliament decide after that? That the Prime Minister-elect has been judicially murdered, so which case will be heard in the Supreme Court on which day and at what time, the Parliament will decide, would it be correct? Just as he is not right, neither is it right in the constitution for the Supreme Court to interfere in the work of Parliament.
The decision of the Supreme Court is an interference in the boundaries of Parliament. The entire Parliament must come together for its own authority. He said that he had tried to take Parliament into confidence on the letter, adding that it was still time to convene an in-camera meeting and take a detailed briefing.

Comments
Post a Comment